We think we’ve done some decent research on tiny house appliances, so here is our first installment on cooling the small abode. Here in DC summers are stifling, so we need real air-conditioning (not evaporative coolers).

Compared to a (far cheaper) traditional travel trailer, the only real advantage of a tiny house is a) better insulation, b) better build quality and c) aesthetics. So keeping air conditioners entirely out of the window is a high priority.  Leaving these aside, along with a number of other inferior options*, and a standard disclaimer about the importance of maximizing building insulation and air sealing before considering air conditioning, there are 3 basic possibilities:

  1. ‘ductless’ mini-split a/c systems, with the evaporator (outside) and air handler (inside) connected separately through the wall.
  2. ‘portable’ a/c units, which sit on the floor inside and vent outside through a hole in the wall (or the window-which would disqualify them). 
  3. ‘through the wall’ a/c units, which look like window units but are specifically designed to be mounted on a frame in a wall, and can protrude into the tiny house, or outside.

The main considerations in deciding between these 3 types of units include:

  • Btu rating. With adequate insulation and air sealing no tiny home under 200 ft2 should need anything larger than 7000 Btus (see BTU calculator).  Note there are some 6000 Btu and 7000 Btu mini split units by Fujitsu and Mitsubishi, though they appear to be packaged only with multizone (room) applications, or run on 240V. In the end it seems that there are currently no mini-split systems under 9000 btus, so they will typically be a bit oversized. Portables and through-the-wall units are commonly available at 5000-9000 Btus.
  • Cool+heat: some, but not all mini-split, portable and through-the-wall a/c systems come with heating. Not having to pay for or wire an additional heating system is a great benefit. While some will choose to heat solely with a propane marine stove, it is most convenient to have a backup electric heat option to keep things from freezing when away from the house. 
  • High efficiency.  SEER is the measure of energy efficiency, and mini-split systems currently range from 13-26 (the higher the better), typically significantly higher than the portable or through-the-wall units.  Portable units keep the compressor inside the house, and draw air from the interior, so they tend to be rather inefficient (which many reviews attest to).  Through-the-wall units do not have this problem. Note that there are a few portable ‘dual hose’ models that draw outside air in, instead of inside air, though almost all of these are 9000 Btus or greater.
  • Indoor footprint: Given the tiny house size constraints, selecting narrow profile units is a priority. For mini-splits, the only indoor part is the air handler, which typically range from 7-12” wide and mount on the wall. Portable and through-the-wall units are quite bulky, but could be build into cabinetry.  For through-the wall and portable units, it is important to note that while taking up more floor space during use, they require no exterior components, and can be easily detached and stored away during temperate months, unlike the mini-splits.
  • Voltage: Note the majority of mini-split systems, and many through-the-wall units run on 240V. Tiny house builders should only go with 120 volt systems, as they do not require special wiring.
  • Multi-speed. Many units will have a ‘low’ setting that runs around 300-400 watts (as opposed to the 1200+ watts on high). At this low setting, future off-grid solar becomes slightly more realistic.
  • Service availability: there seem to be many relatively unknown makers out there, apart from the well known brands- Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Fedder, Friedrichs, etc.
  • Cost: compared to our alternatives, mini-splits are significantly more expensive both in terms of base price and installation costs (which typically requires an HVAC technician to charge the a/c lines, and occasional recharges). It is also not clear how well the exposed a/c lines hold up over long distance travel.  Portable units require a small venting hole out the side or bottom of the house, while through the wall-units need to be framed inside a wall. Creating an opening for these would be a minimal cost- even less so if built into a new construction.

So the takeaway:

For mini-splits: Apart from being a bit oversized for tiny houses, this SEER 22, 9000 Btu Fedders model fits the bill (and can be found cheaper on ebay). There is another from the previously unheard of MG company. The Fencl we have on the lot uses the Klimaire (which is lower SEER and slightly more expensive). There’s also a Freidrichs model (a/c only, and more expensive).

For portables: While there are a wide range of models available online and elsewhere, though some are much narrower than others, and none of the smaller models (8000 Btu’s and less) include heat (one exception here). But the fundamental inefficiencies of these units call us to consider only the dual-hose models, of which there are very few models under 9000 Btus (one exception by the relatively unknown manufacturer SPT here).

For through-the-wall units: Similar to their window-unit cousins, there is a wide array of units designed to be build into a side wall (the key difference being that these units do not have venting on the sides or top/bottom).  Of the many options, this 8000 Btu Freidrich heat/cool model (UE08D11) fits the bill, gets high marks for performance and reliability, and can be installed flush with the exterior wall with an ‘architectural grate’.  After many months of pondering, currently the through-the-wall approach is our preferred option.

————–

*There are a range of other options we investigated, and discarded:

  • Specialized a/c units that go from 1000-9000 Btus for cooling computer servers and such. See Kooltronic, with the drawback of no heating and systems that are not residentially designed.
  • RV units.  It is surprisingly hard to find units smaller than 9000 Btu, and have the drawback of unsightly roof mounting.
  • Marine units (such as those found here), but like weddings, unfortunately anything maritime seems to increase prices by 50%.
  • Climateright 7000 and 2500 Btu tent and small enclosure air conditioners, which could work, and heat and cool, but with the disadvantages of ungainly (uninsulated!) large vent tubes, and the disconcerting caveat that the lowest outside temperature can be 36 degrees for operating heating.

Category:
Design, The Houses
Tags:
, , ,

Join the conversation! 4 Comments

  1. I would add increased overall space and headroom to the tiny house advantages though, most travel trailers I’ve seen have had to sacrifice some of that for the sake of aerodynamics. Interesting post! While there’s plenty of info out there about heat options like marine stoves, there’s been a lack of info for cooling ones, passive solar design is only going to go so far ’round these parts… The in-wall approach makes a lot of sense I think.

    Reply
  2. Here’s some real and current info on the mini split system i own.
    I live in a small apartment, 400+/- sq. ft. in central Florida…the heat and humidity capitol of the world i think! I have used window units and prior to the mini split system and had a portable a/c unit. All worked fairly well to cool the small space, but not all handled the humidity well, leaking condensed water almost constantly where it shouldn’t…also i was constantly replacing bad units, the units all had different dimensions and were a pain to reconfigure openings to be weather tight and fit properly. Finding one with the right dimensions to fit your old opening could mean not getting the best price, or the one you like.
    The mini split even though it’s the same 9k btu as my window unit , does the job better, faster, and with less effort…and cost about ten percent less to run…not saving a lot, but it adds up to cover the big cost difference in time. I’m told to expect ten to fifteen years of service life from it…until now my window units might get two years before failing.
    After a 2 years of use and two 39 dollar scheduled service/ maintenance calls for cleaning the unit (recommended for optimal efficiency) i can tell you i have more faith in this than any of my previous systems. Just cooling my apartment down here runs about $100 a month, nine months a year…once my tiny home is completed i expect that cost to drop in half, not only am i halving my square footage, but will be better insulated…i plan to install a new mini split of the same size, it’s the smallest available…the reason? Space, life expectancy, efficiency, experience.
    The new units can be installed by anyone who can operate a drill, they have refrigerant already in the system, stored while awaiting the connections, not sure how that works but that’s what they claim…the only professional help will be needed to wire the outside unit, supposedly done in less than an hour with all the parts that you need available with the system. The outside unit is very small and can be mounted on a trailer tongue, or wherever you want. It’s about 14 inches wide, and 26 inches tall and supremely quiet…they even sell little shelves for it to be wall mounted outside if you so choose.
    In Florida AC is not a luxury, it’s essential. Not just for the heat, but to dehumidify your home…i’ve seen humidity destroy wood, and cause mold in just weeks, we take our AC seriously here…i’d call the split mini a long term win vs. window units, and a giant win vs. portables.

    Reply

Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,801 other followers

%d bloggers like this: